The internet has a lot of opinions about your health. Eat this. Don’t eat that. This study says one thing. That podcast says the opposite.

I’m a retired farmer. I spent decades reading weather reports, soil tests, and water tables — learning which sources were worth trusting and which ones were selling something. Health information isn’t much different.

Here’s how I decide what to pay attention to:

First, I ask who’s behind it. A researcher with published peer-reviewed work gets more weight than a influencer with a supplement code.

Second, I ask whether it matches my own data. I wear a CGM. I track in Apple Health. When someone tells me a certain food spikes blood sugar, I can check that against my own numbers. That’s a powerful filter.

Third, I ask whether it’s trying to sell me something. Not all commerce is bad — but it changes the math on trust.

The web will always be noisy. I can’t quiet it down. What I can do is build a system that helps me decide what deserves a closer look and what gets composted.

That’s the approach I bring to everything I write here at Gardener of Life.

From the Field

Find me on Ghost: gardener-of-life.com

Micro.blog: micro.blog/gardenero…

Substack: gardeneroflife.substack.com

Food recall alerts: www.foodsafety.gov/recalls-a…

These are observations from one retired dirt farmer — not prescriptions.

William questions everything, including his own opinions.

Curiosity and humility over authority and certainty.

The reader is always the final decision-maker.

If this resonates, buy me a coffee — it keeps the field notes

buymeacoffee.com/gardenero…

Questions or thoughts? Email me at :

contact@gardener-of-life.com